(Half)-Joking aside, I am sort of sad to reach that last page. I'll have to look into their other works as well.
One thing I did learn, though, was always be researching! Look at how many studies these two reference just in one chapter! Education is an always-shifting field, and we need to stay on top of studies and information if we want to stay on top of our game.
Regarding the reading skills: cognitive, linguistic, sociocultural, and critical. Smokey and the Bandit make it sound as though the different styles are mutually exclusive. But why not use a combination of all four? Make it stepping stones! You can't be critical of you read until you learn the cognitive maneuvers of reading and the linguistics of both readers and writers, after all. You don't wake up one morning and start arguing with authors. It takes time to learn those skills--and they are skills that I, a professed skilled reader and questioner of everything under the sun, am still learning myself.
The main gist I took away from this chapter is that reading is like any other skill--it takes practice and commitment and desire to improve. As one research noted, "you can't learn to read from a text you cannot read" and it's true! We need to step away from the idea that reading is an inherent ability (were any of us born knowing how to read? I don't think so, baby Einstein) and focus more on the idea that reading is a fluid skill that takes constant practice and refreshing to improve. There is no such thing as a "dumb" student and I won't have my kids think that way, especially not about themselves.
"EW EW EW EW EW"...was actually the note I wrote when Smokey and the Bandit referred Fifty Shades of Grey as part of the Amazon bestsellers. Disgusting. Although, it did serve the purpose of proving that 'adult readers' are not always 'sophisticated readers'. Seriously, though, I can't believe I just saw that horrifying trainwreck referenced in a textbook I admired. I trusted you two.
So, we teach our students better. We give them the stepping stones to learn so stuff like that doesn't end up on the bestseller list anymore. We give them more credit for what they chose to read and investigate.
Empathy and modeling come up again! Once (and by once I mean "actually an hour ago") I joked about being the "Ian Malcolm of history teachers" but cynicism and bitterness has never actually been my thing. So when Smokey and the Bandit say that we need to engage our kids and that we need to connect with them--model strategies, foster reading communities in the classroom--I believe them and agree with them wholeheartedly. No one wants to be the hum-drum teacher who lectures for fifty minutes and then sends students packing. Why would you want to be? It can't be any fun, and you're doing a disservice to your students--both those who want to learn and those who need just a little more push. But with empathy and positivity. I think the task of engaging students becomes much easier! So I will not be the Ian Malcolm of History. (Well. Maybe a little. Eccentricity has to count for something).
One final note--I do my very best to stay on the optimistic side of things (that's part of the reason why I'd never make a good Ian Malcolm), but reading over this chapter and really getting the idea that you are responsible for the futures of scores of kids...this is daunting stuff. And I am, quite honestly, nervous. Really, really nervous. Can I do it, day in and day out? Can I fight for my kids when no one else will, find the strength in them that they can't find themselves? Will I be the teacher I want to be? It's easy to sit here and type the words "I can do this", but reality is a harsh mistress...
At any rate, the least I can offer my kids is my best, and hope that it works.
All right, emotional spiel out of the way. Let's end this on a positive note.
It's Alexander HAMilton. Get it? GET IT?
Also, someone buy me this mug:
I need it. For eccentric teacher reasons.